Lead Opinion
{¶ 3} On January 10, 2007, Abel filed a motion to suppress, which he later withdrew. On June 21, 2007, the State moved to consolidate Abel's case with the cases involving two co-defendants. *2 Abel opposed the motion to consolidate, and the State replied. The two co-defendants ultimately entered pleas, rendering the motion to consolidate moot.
{¶ 4} On October 25, 2007, Abel voluntarily waived and relinquished his right to a trial by jury, and the matter proceeded to trial before the court. At the conclusion of the bench trial, the court found Abel guilty of all six counts and the four firearm specifications. Abel filed a sentencing memorandum, appending numerous letters by friends, family and community members in support. The trial court sentenced Abel to one year in prison on the firearm specification and to three years of community control on counts one through five. There is no indication that the trial court sentenced Abel for his safecracking conviction.
{¶ 5} Abel filed a motion to stay his sentence pending the appeal. The trial court granted the stay and set bail conditioned upon Abel's "appealing this matter without delay[.]" Abel filed his notice of appeal on January 3, 2008. On January 9, 2008, the trial court noted that it had granted a stay of enforcement of the prison sentence and ordered Abel to immediately begin serving his community control sentence pending the determination of the appeal. Abel raises three assignments of error for this Court's review.
"APPELLANT'S RIGHT TO INDICTMENT BY GRAND JURY UNDER THE OHIO CONSTITUTION, AND APPELLANT'S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS UNDER THE OHIO AND FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONS WERE VIOLATED BECAUSE COUNT FOUR OF THE INDICTMENT OMITTED ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF THE OFFENSE OF BURGLARY."
"THE CONVICTIONS FOR ALL COUNTS WERE AGAINST THE MANIFEST WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE."*3
"THE CONVICTIONS FOR THE GUN SPECIFICATIONS WERE AGAINST THE MANIFEST WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE."
{¶ 6} Abel asserts that his convictions must be reversed because his burglary indictment is defective and the convictions on all six counts, and the gun specifications, are against the manifest weight of the evidence. This Court lacks the jurisdiction to consider Abel's arguments.
{¶ 7} This Court must "sua sponte dismiss appeals which are not from final appealable orders." State v. Martin, 9th Dist. No. 06CA0069,
{¶ 8} This Court has held that "a Journal Entry must dispose of all charges brought in a single case against a defendant in order to be final." State v. Goodwin, 9th Dist. No. 23337,
Appeal dismissed.
The Court finds that there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
We order that a special mandate issue out of this Court, directing the Court of Common Pleas, County of Lorain, State of Ohio, to carry this judgment into execution. A certified copy of this journal entry shall constitute the mandate, pursuant to App. R. 27.
Immediately upon the filing hereof, this document shall constitute the journal entry of judgment, and it shall be file stamped by the Clerk of the Court of Appeals at which time the period for review shall begin to run. App. R. 22(E). The Clerk of the Court of Appeals is instructed to mail a notice of entry of this judgment to the parties and to make a notation of the mailing in the docket, pursuant to App. R. 30.
*5Costs taxed to Appellant.
Dissenting Opinion
{¶ 10} I respectfully dissent from the majority's conclusion that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear this appeal for the reasons enunciated in my dissent in State v. Goodwin, 9th Dist. No. 23337,
