86 S.E. 787 | N.C. | 1915
This proceeding began by warrant before a justice of the peace, and on appeal to the Superior Court by the defendant it was found, on a special verdict, that the defendant, after having been warned by the road supervisor to work the public roads of his township, failed to do so, and also failed to pay the sum of $4 in lieu of such work, as required by section 4, chapter 16, Public-Local Laws 1915. This provision is as follows: "Any person liable to such duty may pay to the supervisor of his township or road district the sum of $4 in lieu of such labor, to be applied by such supervisor to the improvement of the roads in that district."
The defendant was 35 years of age and subject to road duty. Upon the special verdict the court was of opinion that the defendant was guilty, and the jury so found.
The contention of the defendant is that the requirement that any person liable to road duty in Caswell County who shall fail to work the roads shall pay $4, to be applied to the roads, in lieu of his labor for four days, is a capitation tax, and unconstitutional.
In S. v. Wheeler,
In S. v. Wheeler, supra, we said, after full deliberation and (695) reconsideration of the above cases: "For near 250 years the roads of this State were worked solely by the conscription of labor. It may have been inequitable, but it was never thought by any one to be unconstitutional, nor has the idea been advanced heretofore that to work the roads by labor was to work them by taxation. The validity of working the roads by labor was sustained in S. v. Halifax,
The subject has been so fully discussed in the cases above cited that we can add nothing. The system of working roads by conscription of labor was handed down to us from the English law, S. v. Covington, 125 N.C. at p. 641, and was the system among the Romans till in their later days when by large appropriations they built the magnificent highways whose remains still abide. Working roads by conscription of labor was the system in France, where it was known as Corvees, and was one of the great grievances which were swept away by their Revolution.
The objection that working roads by conscription of labor is essentially unjust, because it places an undue burden upon those who use the roads least, has been often presented to us, and we can only repeat what was said in S. v. Holleman,
Originally, in all countries, doubtless, roads were worked by conscription of labor. The tendency has been, with advancing civilization, to *782 change to a system of working the roads by taxation of property. This has become the rule in some countries and in some States of this Union, and is being gradually adopted in this State, as much by reason of the fact that working the roads by conscripted labor has proven inefficient as by consideration of the injustice of the discrimination involved in that system. But how far and when the change shall be made, and to what localities it shall apply, is for the lawmaking body, which prescribes the public policy for the State, and not for the courts.
Whenever the policy of working the roads by taxation is adopted, of course the constitutional equation applies, as was held in S. v. Godwin,
Affirmed.
Cited: S. v. Kelly,
(696)