History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. . O'Connor
223 N.C. 469
N.C.
1943
Check Treatment

O'Connor was indicted in the Superior Court of Harnett County for breaking and entering, and his codefendant in this proceeding, the Tar Heel Bond Company, became surety for his appearance in court to answer the charge. Upon his failure to appear at September Term, 1941, of said court, judgment nisi was entered against O'Connor *Page 470 and his said surety, and sci. fa. issued and served upon the defendant surety. Upon return of the sci. fa. at January, 1942, Term of the court, upon motion of the solicitor, judgment absolute was entered against O'Connor and his surety, the Tar Heel Bond Company, in the amount of $2,000.00, the penal sum named in the bond.

Subsequently, the defendants made a motion to set the judgment aside because of surprise and excusable neglect — C. S., 600 — alleging that they had been misled because the motion for judgment absolute did not appear for hearing on the printed calendar of cases to be heard at that term. The motion was denied and defendants appealed.

Inspection of the record discloses that defendants, in their motion, made no allegation that they had any meritorious defense, and none was presented on the hearing of their motion. Dunn v. Jones, 195 N.C. 354,356, 142 S.E. 320; Bank v. Duke, 187 N.C. 386, 122 S.E. 1; Cayton v.Clark, 212 N.C. 374, 193 S.E. 304. The motion was properly denied.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. . O'Connor
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Oct 13, 1943
Citation: 223 N.C. 469
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.