19 S.E. 375 | N.C. | 1894
After verdict and judgment, the defendants moved in arrest of judgment. The court, as a matter of discretion, set aside the verdict and sentence, granting a new trial. A new bill was found at the same term, upon testimony of same witnesses, stating the same charge more explicitly. The defendants were again put to trial, treating the two bills as several counts in the same indictment. This was admissible. S. v. Johnson,
As to the plea of former conviction, the former verdict was against the defendants, and having been set aside in the discretion of the (846) court, nothing remains to support the plea of former conviction. If the first count was defective, so that judgment should have been arrested, the defendants have not been in former jeopardy. S. v.England,
It was perfectly proper to send a second bill at the same term. S. v.Harris,
No error.
Cited: S. v. Marsh,