The defendant was charged with violation of certain provisions of chapter 86, Public Laws of 1937, creating a licensing board for tile contractors. The jury returned verdict of guilty, and from judgment in accord therewith defendant appealed.
The defendant entered in this Court motion in arrest of judgment, on the ground that the statute under which defendant was tried fails to set out a criminal offense. S. v. Lumber Co.,
The material portion of the statute under which the criminal charge against the defendant was laid is as follows: "Sec. 11. Any person, firm or corporation not being duly licensed to engage in the tile contracting in this State as provided for in this act, . . . shall be guilty of misdemeanor."
It is apparent that the acts, the doing of which shall constitute a misdemeanor, are not set out. No criminal offense is stated.
It is contended, however, that in the interpretation of the statute, and the ascertainment of the legislative intent, words should be supplied to define the acts to be prohibited, but the court has no power to determine what acts or omissions, if any, the General Assembly intended to make *Page 575
unlawful, in the absence of an expression of the legislative will in the language used. Nor was anything said in S. v. Humphrey,
This disposition of the case renders it unnecessary to consider on this record the question debated as to the constitutionality of the act the validity of certain of its provisions. In re Parker,
Judgment arrested.