History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. . Dove
189 N.C. 248
N.C.
1925
Check Treatment

The defendant was indicted for transporting intoxicating liquor in violation of law. The verdict was returned in the afternoon and when the court reconvened the next morning the defendant sought to impeach the verdict by a statement of one of the jurors who was contradicted by all the others. In S. v. Best, 111 N.C. 638, the Court said: "We find ourselves concluded by the authority of an established and long-settled rule based upon the wisest reasons of public policy, that a juror should not be permitted to impeach his own conduct in the rendition of a verdict." S. v.Hall, 181 N.C. 527; S. v. Brittain, 89 N.C. 482.

The motion to dismiss was properly refused.

We find

No error.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. . Dove
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Mar 4, 1925
Citation: 189 N.C. 248
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.