History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. . Blankenship
117 N.C. 808
N.C.
1895
Check Treatment

The defendant asked certain instructions, which were not given. The refusal is deemed excepted to, but if the exception is not set out by the appellant in stating his case on appeal it is waived. Taylor v. Plummer, 105 N.C. 56; Marshall v. Stine, (809)112 N.C. 697; Davis v. Duval, 112 N.C. 833. Indeed, no *Page 556 exception whatever appears to have been made, and, no error appearing upon the face of the record proper, the judgment must be affirmed. See numerous cases cited in Clark's Code, p. 582, subhead "Where no errors are assigned."

Affirmed.

Cited: Cunningham v. Cunningham, 121 N.C. 417; Wilson v. Wilson,125 N.C. 527; Hicks v. Kenan, 139 N.C. 338; Hancock v. Tel. Co.,142 N.C. 163.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. . Blankenship
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Sep 5, 1895
Citation: 117 N.C. 808
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.