History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. . Alley
104 S.E. 365
N.C.
1920
Check Treatment

This is an indictment for abandonment.

The State offered evidence, and the defendant testified in his own behalf.

At the conclusion of the evidence the record states that the judge said: "Gentlemen, this ends the case. On the testimony of the witness himself he is technically guilty.

Defendant excepted.

The judge then directed the clerk to enter a verdict of guilty. The defendant excepted.

There was a verdict of guilty entered by the clerk, and the defendant appealed from the judgment thereon. Reversed on authority of S. v. Riley, 113 N.C. 648; S. v. Hill,141 N.C. 772, holding that the judge cannot direct a verdict in a criminal action.

New trial. *Page 664

Case Details

Case Name: State v. . Alley
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Oct 20, 1920
Citation: 104 S.E. 365
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.