493 N.E.2d 552 | Ohio Ct. App. | 1985
On November 2, 1983, David Bender, a.k.a. Nathan Gaines, was indicted for one count of forgery, one count of receiving stolen property, and one count of possession of criminal tools. On January 24, 1984, Bender was indicted for one count of possession of criminal tools and one count of complicity to commit forgery. The charges arose out of a series of activities which took place on September 26 and 27, 1983.
Bender and three companions drove from Cleveland to the Midway Mall in Elyria on September 27. When they arrived Bender took his car to the Sears Auto Center for repairs. The four entered the shopping area to wait for the repairs to be completed. Bender and one of his companions, Cheryl Crenshaw, entered Sears where he gave her a credit slip. She took the slip to the cashier and signed her name to it for a refund. Crenshaw was stopped and arrested by Sears' security officers. Bender was also arrested and charged with having forged a credit slip on the previous day. After Bender's arrest, the Elyria police made a search of his car. They found a credit card bearing the name of a third person as well as other unsigned Sears credit slips.
Crenshaw pled guilty to a charge of forgery. Bender, after a trial to a jury, was convicted of one count of forgery, one count of possession of criminal tools, and one count of complicity to commit forgery. * * *1
Bender was indicted for possession of criminal tools in violation of R.C.
R.C.
"(A) No person shall possess or have under his control any substance, device, instrument, or article, with purpose to use it criminally.
"(B) Each of the following constitutes prima-facie evidence of criminal purpose:
"(1) Possession or control of any dangerous ordnance, or the materials or parts for making dangerous ordnance, in the absence of circumstances indicating such dangerous ordnance, materials, or parts are intended for legitimate use;
"(2) Possession or control of any substance, device, instrument, or article designed or specially adapted for criminal use;
"(3) Possession or control of any substance, device, instrument, or article commonly used for criminal purposes, under circumstances indicating such item is intended for criminal use."
These credit slips were not items which would be prima facie evidence of criminal purpose under the statute. Since they did not constitute prima facie evidence of such purpose, criminal intent had to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt without the benefit of the statutory inference. State v. Anderson (1981),
The record demonstrates that the day prior to Bender's arrest, Bender did use a similar credit slip. The slips in question were partially completed in the name of John Richardson. Under the facts in the record, there is sufficient evidence from which a jury could conclude that Bender possessed the credit slips with the intent to commit a crime. State v. Eley (1978),
Bender was convicted of complicity in the commission of a forgery committed by Crenshaw under R.C.
Crenshaw received the credit slip from Bender, whom she had just met that day, for a chain saw in the amount of $
R.C.
"* * * [T]o fabricate or create, in whole or in part and by any means, any spurious writing, or to make, execute, alter, complete, reproduce, or otherwise purport to authenticate anywriting, when such writing in fact is not authenticatedthereby." (Emphasis added.)
The fact that Crenshaw signed her own name and used her own identification does not make legitimate an otherwise spurious credit slip. The record sufficiently supports the conclusion that Crenshaw violated R.C.
This assignment of error is overruled. * * *
All assignments of error having *133 been overruled, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
BAIRD, P.J., and MAHONEY, J., concur.