History
  • No items yet
midpage
State of Louisiana v. Bueford
160 La. 756
| La. | 1926
|
Check Treatment

Appellants were convicted of the crime of stealing $100 from the person of one Bradley Lafouse, in violation of Act No. 40 of 1914, p. 104. One of them, Norman Leake, afterwards broke jail and is a fugitive from justice. The Attorney General therefore filed a motion to dismiss Leake's appeal, and his attorney agrees that the appeal should be dismissed. With regard to the other appellant, Armne Bueford, it is sufficient to say that there is no bill of exception in the record, no assignment of error, and, in fact, no error in the proceedings.

The appeal of Norman Leake is dismissed, and the verdict and sentence against Armne Bueford are affirmed. *Page 757

Case Details

Case Name: State of Louisiana v. Bueford
Court Name: Supreme Court of Louisiana
Date Published: Mar 1, 1926
Citation: 160 La. 756
Docket Number: No. 27746.
Court Abbreviation: La.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.