State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Sewell

Jordan, Judge.

Under the decision of this court in Georgia Life &c. Ins. Co. v. Sewell, 113 Ga. App. 443 (1) (148 SE2d 447), which involved the same plaintiff and the same accident and a similar policy provision, the excerpt from the charge complained of was not erroneous for any reasons enumerated, and since the evidence, differing only slightly from that in the above stated case, did not demand a verdict for the defendant the trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion for directed verdict and the subsequent motion for a new trial.

Submitted September 6, 1966 Decided September 16, 1966 Rehearing denied September 23, 1966 Heard & Leverett, E. Freeman Leverett, for appellant. McClure, Ramsay & Struble, Robert B. Struble, Joseph S. Skelton, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Sewell

Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date Published: Sep 16, 1966

Citation: 114 Ga. App. 331

Docket Number: 42252

Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.