midpage

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. ReinhartState Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Reinhart

Ohio Supreme Court
Apr 5, 1995
1994-2173
Versions:1995 Ohio 170
71 Ohio St. 3d 654

Insurance—Insurer fails to exercise good faith in the processing of a claim of its insured, when.

Hamilton, Kramer, Myers & Cheek and James R. Gallagher, for appellant and cross-appellee.

Luigia Tenuta, for appellees and cross-appellants.

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is not allowed, but the discretionary cross-appeal is allowed. The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings on the authority of Zoppo v. Homestead Ins. Co., (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 552, 644 N.E.2d 397.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.

Wright, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Zoppo v. Homestead Ins. Co. (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 552, 559-262, 644 N.E.2d 397, 402-404.

Case Details

Case Name: State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Reinhart
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 5, 1995
Citations: 1995 Ohio 170; 71 Ohio St. 3d 654; 1994-2173
Docket Number: 1994-2173
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In