midpage

State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionState ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction

Ohio Supreme Court
Apr 20, 1994
No. 93-2552
Versions:
Per Curiam.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reason stated in the court’s opinion, i.e., declaratory judgment provides an adequate remedy to appellant and its availability was thus an appropriate basis to deny the writ. State ex rel. Citizens for Fair Taxation v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 749, 752, 591 N.E.2d 691, 693; State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovern (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 129, 11 OBR 426, 464 N.E.2d 525, paragraph two of the syllabus; R.C. 2731.05.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 20, 1994
Citations: 69 Ohio St. 3d 70; 630 N.E.2d 365; No. 93-2552
Docket Number: No. 93-2552
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In