History
  • No items yet
midpage
State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction
630 N.E.2d 365
Ohio
1994
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reason stated in the court’s opinion, i.e., declaratory judgment provides an adequate remedy to appellant and its availability was thus an appropriate basis to deny the writ. State ex rel. Citizens for Fair Taxation v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Commrs. (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 749, 752, 591 N.E.2d 691, 693; State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovern (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 129, 11 OBR 426, 464 N.E.2d 525, paragraph two of the syllabus; R.C. 2731.05.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 20, 1994
Citation: 630 N.E.2d 365
Docket Number: No. 93-2552
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.