State ex rel. Wilson v. Industrial CommissionState ex rel. Wilson v. Industrial Commission
{¶ 1} Appellant, Angela Wilson, contested the start date of benefits to her minor child, Michael Hickman, following the death of his father, Chris D. Witt, in
{¶ 2} The court of appeals referred the matter to a magistrate, who on March 15, 2002, issued a report recommending that the writ be denied. Thirty-four days later, appellant filed objections to that report. The commission responded with a motion to strike the objections as untimely and appellant made no reply. The court granted that motion and ultimately adopted the magistrate’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.
{¶ 3} This cause is now before this court upon an appeal as of right.
{¶ 4} Appellant’s arguments derive directly from the conclusions of law provided in the magistrate’s decision. Appellant, however, did not timely object to those conclusions as
{¶ 5} Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.