40 Minn. 369 | Minn. | 1889
So far as relates to the right to appeal from the action of the supervisors discontinuing the road to a justice of the peace and a jury, the case is not essentially different from that of State v. Barton, 36 Minn. 145, (30 N. W. Rep. 454.) In that case the party appealing was a farmer, and the change in the road made the distance to the city, where he marketed the proceeds of his farm,
Note. So much of the judgment entered in accordance with the opinion, as, awarded costs against the respondent, was vacated by subsequent order of the court.