State ex rel. Whetstone v. Bonded Oil Co.State ex rel. Whetstone v. Bonded Oil Co.
State ex rel. Stephenson v. Indus. Comm. (1987),
Claimant has a nonallowed pre-existing condition that Dr. Howard described as a “passive aggressive personality disorder with explosive features.” Claimant asserts that this condition falls within the “all other factors” of which Stephenson demands consideration.
Claimant’s position effectively nullifies the important distinction between allowed and nonallowed conditions by according the two equal consideration, the latter under the guise of “all other factors.” Claimant’s proposition also effectively permits a claimant to receive permanent total disability compensation by combining the most insignificant work injury with serious nonindustrial health problems. Being unable to ascribe either intent to Stephenson, we reject claimant’s argument.
Claimant also unpersuasively asserts a violation of State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm. (1991),
Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.