108 Fla. 509 | Fla. | 1933
In this case a supersedeas was granted by order of the Circuit Judge after final judgment for respondents was entered in a prohibition proceedings had in the Circuit Court. The effect of the supersedeas under such circumstances is to hold in full force and effect the statutory supersedeas that went into operation when the rule to show cause in the prohibition case was ordered by the Circuit Court to issue to arrest the progress of the suit being heard by the County Judge when therule nisi in prohibition was applied for. See Section 3451 C. G. L., 3586 R. G. S.
The motion to vacate and set aside the supersedeas on the ground that a supersedeas cannot be had to a final judgment denying a writ of prohibition absolute is therefore denied.
On the question of the sufficiency of the present bond to, protect the rights of Allen Investment Company while the. supersedeas is in force, should the judgment appealed from be affirmed, leave is hereby given to the defendant in error *511
to proceed before the Circuit Court in accordance with Stegemann v. Emery,
It is so ordered.
DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD, TERRELL and BUFORD, J. J., concur.