76 So. 444 | Ala. | 1917
In the case of State ex rel. v. Town of Phil Campbell,
The plat in question is void upon its face, for, regardless of the county or counties in which it places the land, it sets up an impossibility as to the territory therein embraced and as located. For instance, in setting out the sections, or parts thereof, embracing the territory, the arrangement with respect to location is an impossibility. It has section 4 in township 12 under and immediately south of section 32 in township 11, and section 3 of township 12 immediately south of section 33 in township 11. This is a patent error, not self-correcting, and the plat is an impossibility as to the description of the territory to be embraced in the proposed town, and is therefore unlike the one considered in the case of Foshee v. Kay, 72 *503 503 So. 391.1 There the error was self-correcting, for, while the plat recited that it was in a certain township, other physical facts appeared on said plat to show that it was in a township immediately north. Here we have sections arranged contiguous to each other which is impossible, and nothing on the face of the plat to reconcile or explain this error, if such a one could be explained or reconciled.
The circuit court erred in denying the relator relief, and the judgment is reversed, and one is here rendered quashing the incorporating proceedings and ousting the respondents.
Reversed and rendered.
MAYFIELD, SOMERVILLE, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.