History
  • No items yet
midpage
State ex rel. Unthank v. Holland Motor Express, Inc.
97 Ohio St. 3d 181
Ohio
2002
Check Treatment

THE STATE EX REL. UNTHANK, APPELLANT, v. HOLLAND MOTOR EXPRESS, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES.

No. 2001-1459

Supreme Court of Ohio

Submitted September 17, 2002—Decided November 6, 2002.

97 Ohio St.3d 181, 2002-Ohio-5785

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 00AP-1251.

Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed.

{¶1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

DOUGLAS, J., dissents.

RESNICK, J., dissents, would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals, and would order relief pursuant to State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666.

Clements, Mahin & Cohen, L.L.P., and Lane N. Cohen, for appellant.

Schottenstein, Zox & Dunn Co., L.P.A., and Corey V. Crognale, for appellee Holland Motor Express, Inc.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Gerald H. Waterman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Industrial Commission of Ohio and Administrator, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Unthank v. Holland Motor Express, Inc.
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 6, 2002
Citation: 97 Ohio St. 3d 181
Docket Number: 2001-1459
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In