State ex rel. Tran v. McMackin, 62 Ohio St. 3d 165

Per Curiam.

On appeal, appellant argues that his conviction was obtained through fraud and trickery of the state and his court-appointed counsel. These allegations do not attack the jurisdiction of the sentencing court and are not grounds for issuing a writ of habeas corpus. See R.C. 2725.05 and State, ex rel. Justice, v. McMackin (1990), 53 Ohio St.3d 72, 558 N.E.2d 1183.

Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Tran v. McMackin

Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court

Date Published: Dec 4, 1991

Citations: 62 Ohio St. 3d 165; 580 N.E.2d 782; 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2792; No. 90-2043

Docket Number: No. 90-2043

Court Abbreviation: Ohio