State ex rel. Toerner v. Common Pleas Court

28 Ohio St. 2d 213 | Ohio | 1971

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reason that the complaint for a writ of prohibition does not state a cause of action. Prohibition is not a substitute for appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Schneider, Herbert, Corrigan, Stern and Leach, JJ., concur.