midpage

State ex rel. Taylor v. LefflerState ex rel. Taylor v. Leffler

Ohio Supreme Court
Mar 8, 2000
No. 99-1733
Versions:
Per Curiam.

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its opinion. A writ of mandamus will not issue to compel an act already performed. State ex rel. Sharif v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 375, 376, 708 N.E.2d 718, 719. And appellees had no duty to create documents to meet Taylor’s requests. State ex rel. Warren v. Warner (1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 432, 433, 704 N.E.2d 1228, 1229.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Taylor v. Leffler
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 8, 2000
Citations: 88 Ohio St. 3d 178; 724 N.E.2d 422; No. 99-1733
Docket Number: No. 99-1733
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In
    State ex rel. Taylor v. Leffler, 88 Ohio St. 3d 178