History
  • No items yet
midpage
State Ex Rel. Stine v. Atkinson
136 Ohio St. 72
Ohio
1939
Check Treatment

Under Section 1345-13, General Code (116 Ohio Laws, pt. 2, 286, 298), the power of appointment was exercised by the Unemployment Compensation Commission, subject to the civil service laws, but under Section 1346-1, General Code (Section 2, S. B. No. 57, 93 General Assembly, 118 Ohio Laws, —), the powers and duties of that commission were vested solely in the administrator of the Bureau of Unemployment Compensation.

Assuming relator was lawfully appointed and unlawfully dismissed as alleged, the administrator is the only person to whom a writ of mandamus may issue compelling reinstatement of the relator. Section 12283, General Code.

The demurrer will be sustained for misjoinder of respondents and the relator will be granted 20 days in which to plead further.

Demurrer sustained.

WEYGANDT, C.J., DAY, ZIMMERMAN, WILLIAMS, MYERS, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State Ex Rel. Stine v. Atkinson
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 22, 1939
Citation: 136 Ohio St. 72
Docket Number: 27722
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.