History
  • No items yet
midpage
State ex rel. Simmons v. State
592 So. 2d 513
La. Ct. App.
1992
Check Treatment

WRIT DENIED: Since relator is represented by counsel, he should proceed through his attorney. Relator has no right to be both represented and representative. See State v. McCabe, 420 So.2d 955 (La. 1982); State v. Bodley, 394 So.2d 584 (La. 1981).

This Court will not review the merits of an application filed by a pro se applicant who is represented by counsel unless the applicant alleges deficiencies in the performance of his counsel and has presented that complaint to the district court. Herein, if relator seeks to resume the hearing on his application for post conviction relief or complain of his counsel’s performance, he should first address those complaints to the district court.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Simmons v. State
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Jan 7, 1992
Citation: 592 So. 2d 513
Docket Number: No. KW 91 2219
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.