History
  • No items yet
midpage
State Ex Rel. Scherer v. Moriarty
209 Minn. 604
Minn.
1941
Check Treatment

1 Reported in 295 N.W. 518. When the promise of two members of the court was given that an oral hearing would be granted respondent upon the alternative writ, neither the return nor petitioner's traverse thereof had been examined. It is now apparent that petitioner's fear that his cases would be continued over the term was unfounded. All parties interested in this matter will, upon sober reflection, reach the conclusion that a discussion of the situation in open court will not be conducive to a better understanding. More patience, consideration, and forbearance one with the other will bring the best results. It seems unnecessary to repeat what was said in State ex rel. Fickling v. Moriarty, 208 Minn. 469, 294 N.W. 473.

The alternative writ is discharged. *Page 605

Case Details

Case Name: State Ex Rel. Scherer v. Moriarty
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Jan 10, 1941
Citation: 209 Minn. 604
Docket Number: No. 32,792.
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.