2008 Ohio 214 | Ohio Ct. App. | 2008
{¶ 2} Respondent has filed a motion for summary judgment attached to which is a copy of a journal entry issued by respondent and received for filing by the clerk on May 24, 2007 in which respondent denied the "motion to vacate and or modify sentence." Relator has not opposed the motion for summary judgment. As a consequence, this action in mandamus is moot.
{¶ 3} Santos's complaint and supporting documentation also are defective in ways that require dismissal. He has not included the addresses of the parties in the caption as required by Civ.R. 10(A).State ex rel. Hall v. Calabrese (Aug. 16, 2001), Cuyahoga App. No. 79810, at 2. Also, he has failed to include a certified copy of the prison cashier's statement of the balance in his inmate account as required by R.C.
{¶ 4} We also note that the "Verification of the Facts" merely recites that "all the facts in the aforementioned complaint are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge." Santos's use of this conclusory statement is not sufficient to comply with the Loc.App.R. 45(B)(1) requirement that the affidavit must specify the details of the claim.Turner v. Russo, Cuyahoga App. No. 87852,
{¶ 5} Accordingly, respondent's motion for summary judgment is granted. Relator to pay costs. The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58(B).
Writ denied.
*1KENNETH A. ROCCO, J., and MELODY J. STEWART, J., CONCUR.