State ex rel. Ruffin v. Court of Common Pleas, No. 75-989

No. 75-989 | Ohio | Apr 28, 1976

Per Curiam.

Appellant’s remedy is by way of appeal, and “prohibition is not a substitute for appeal.” State, ex rel. Gilla, v. Fellerhoff (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 86" court="Ohio" date_filed="1975-11-26" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/state-ex-rel-gilla-v-fellerhoff-6755610?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="6755610">44 Ohio St. 2d 86, 88.

The judgment'of the Court of Appeals, dismissing the complaint in prohibition, is affirmed: '■ '

■Judgment affirmed.

O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Ceeebrezze, "W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.