THE STATE EX REL. ROSE, APPELLANT, v. MCGINTY, JUDGE, APPELLEE.
No. 2009-0464
Supreme Court of Ohio
Submitted August 11, 2009—Decided August 18, 2009
123 Ohio St.3d 86, 2009-Ohio-4050
{11} This is an appeal from a judgment of the court of appeals denying a petition filed by appellant, Floyd Rose, for writs of procedendo and mandamus.
{12} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals because Rose does not challenge all of the independent reasons given by that court to deny the writs. State ex rel. Schmidt v. School Emps. Retirement Sys., 100 Ohio St.3d 317, 2003-Ohio-6086, 798 N.E.2d 1088, ¶ 5; Stewart v. Corrigan, 97 Ohio St.3d 80, 2002-Ohio-5316, 776 N.E.2d 103, ¶ 4. That is, Rose does not contest the propriety of the court of appeals’ denial of the writs based on his failure to comply with
Judgment affirmed.
MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O‘CONNOR, O‘DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.
Floyd Rose, pro se.
William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and James E. Moss, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.