midpage

State ex rel. Richard v. WellsState ex rel. Richard v. Wells

Ohio Supreme Court
Jun 17, 1992
No. 91-1919
Versions:
Per Curiam.

On appeal, appellant submits “evidence” that he did in fact file the motion in question in the court of common pleas on April 30, 1991. Similarly, appellee submits “evidence” that the motion was denied on May 14, 1991, and argues that the mandamus action is now moot.

In Miner v. Witt (1910), 82 Ohio St. 237, 92 N.E. 21, we allowed facts outside the record to show that a case had become moot. Accordingly, we find that the cause is moot, and on that basis we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Richard v. Wells
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 17, 1992
Citations: 64 Ohio St. 3d 76; 591 N.E.2d 1240; 1992 Ohio LEXIS 1336; No. 91-1919
Docket Number: No. 91-1919
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In
    State ex rel. Richard v. Wells, 64 Ohio St. 3d 76