131 Minn. 349 | Minn. | 1915
Action under Laws 1913, p. 815, c. 563,
The abatement law was considered in State v. New England F. & C. Co. 126 Minn. 78, 147 N. W. 951, 52 L.R.A.(N.S.) 933, and State v. Byder, 126 Minn. 95, 147 N. W. 953. A reference to these cases gives a general understanding of the law.
The appellants assign many errors. They will be disposed of briefly.
The record is in very much confusion and the work of reviewing it has been great. It is claimed that, by reason of certain findings, the Terretts may be prejudiced through subsequent litigation with Mick. All danger of this can be corrected by the court striking out some unnecessary findings so that no prejudice will result. Mick is and ought
Order affirmed.
[(G. S. 1913, §§ 8717-8726].