History
  • No items yet
midpage
State ex rel. Nozik v. Ford
664 N.E.2d 536
Ohio
1996
Check Treatment

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for issuance of an alternative writ,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for issuance of an alternative writ be, and hereby is, denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Nozik v. Ford
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: May 15, 1996
Citation: 664 N.E.2d 536
Docket Number: 96-1061
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.