midpage

State ex rel. Nelson v. RussoState ex rel. Nelson v. Russo

Ohio Supreme Court
Dec 22, 2011
2011-1438
Versions:2011 Ohio 6552
131 Ohio St. 3d 51
960 N.E.2d 448

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the request of appellant, Carl A. Nelson Sr., for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Judge Nancy M. Russo, to correct an alleged clerical error in his sentencing entry so that his sentences for four counts of rape and one count of kidnapping run concurrently rather than consecutively.

{¶ 2} Nelson had an adequate remedy by way of appeal to raise his claim of sentencing error. State ex rel. Gooden v. Teodosio, 128 Ohio St.3d 538, 2011-Ohio-1915, 947 N.E.2d 1206, ¶ 3. And because Nelson has already raised his claim of sentencing error, see State v. Nelson, Cuyahoga App. No. 95420, 2010-Ohio-6032, 2010 WL 5065419, res judicata bars him from using mandamus to relitigate the same issue. See State ex rel. McDonald v. Mitrovich, 113 Ohio St.3d 167, 2007-Ohio-1258, 863 N.E.2d 172, ¶ 8. Nor can Nelson raise any asserted constitutional claim that he could have raised in his prior appeal. Smith v. Voorhies, 119 Ohio St.3d 345, 2008-Ohio-4479, 894 N.E.2d 44, ¶ 11.

Judgment affirmed.

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.

Carl A. Nelson Sr., pro se.

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and James Moss, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Nelson v. Russo
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 22, 2011
Citations: 2011 Ohio 6552; 131 Ohio St. 3d 51; 960 N.E.2d 448; 2011-1438
Docket Number: 2011-1438
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In