History
  • No items yet
midpage
State ex rel. Morales v. City of Cleveland
621 N.E.2d 403
Ohio
1993
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The court of appeals did not abuse its discretion in finding these particular witness statements not exempt as trial preparation records. See State ex rel. Williams v. Cleveland (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 544, 597 N.E.2d 147; State ex rel. Coleman v. Cincinnati (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 83, 566 N.E.2d 151. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Morales v. City of Cleveland
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 10, 1993
Citation: 621 N.E.2d 403
Docket Number: No. 93-268
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In