midpage

State ex rel. Missik v. City of YoungstownState ex rel. Missik v. City of Youngstown

Ohio Supreme Court
Dec 9, 1992
No. 92-155
Versions:65 Ohio St. 3d 189
602 N.E.2d 633
1992 Ohio LEXIS 2891
Per Curiam.

Pursuant to our decision in State ex rel. Litten v. Indus. Comm. (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 178, 602 N.E.2d 624, we find that the commission’s permanent total disability finding, by attributing the award’s costs exclusively to PEL3212, did not encompass PEL4593 and PE626746. We thus find that the commission abused its discretion in. dismissing claimant’s permanent partial disability application in PEL4593. However, because PEL3212 and PE626746 both involve back injuries, the commission did not err in dismissing claimant’s permanent partial disability application in the latter claim. State ex rel. Consolidation Coal Co. v. Indus. Comm. (1980), 62 Ohio St.2d 147, 16 O.O.3d 166, 404 N.E.2d 141.

We thus affirm that portion of the appellate judgment that found no abuse of discretion by the commission in dismissing claimant’s permanent partial disability application in PE626746. The balance of the judgment is reversed. We order the commission to consider the merits of the application in PEL4593.

Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part and writ granted in part.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., dissents.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Missik v. City of Youngstown
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 9, 1992
Citations: 65 Ohio St. 3d 189; 602 N.E.2d 633; 1992 Ohio LEXIS 2891; No. 92-155
Docket Number: No. 92-155
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In