State ex rel. McCord v. Indus. Comm.
2000 Ohio 487
Ohio
2000
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 [This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 575.]

T HE S TATE EX REL . M C C ORD , A PPELLANT , v . I NDUSTRIAL C OMMISSION OF

O HIO ET AL ., A PPELLEES . [Cite as State ex rel. McCord v. Indus. Comm. , 2000-Ohio-487.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on authority of

State ex rel. Baker v. Indus. Comm.—Writ of mandamus allowed. (No. 00-674—Submitted July 25, 2000—Decided September 6, 2000.) A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-454.

__________________ Thompson, Meier & Dersom and Thomas D. Thompson , for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery , Attorney General, and Sandee E. Blabolil , Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.

Eastman & Smith, Ltd., Thomas A. Dixon and Margaret A. Mattimoe , for appellee John Cheeseman Trucking, Inc.

__________________

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeal is reversed on the authority of State ex rel. Baker v. Indus. Comm. (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 376, 732 N.E.2d 355.

{¶ 2} The writ of mandamus compelling the Industrial Commission of Ohio to award appellant temporary total disability compensation benefits is allowed.

M OYER , C.J., D OUGLAS , R ESNICK , F.E. S WEENEY , P FEIFER , C OOK and L UNDBERG S TRATTON , JJ., concur.

__________________