History
  • No items yet
midpage
State ex rel. Mayne v. Baldwin
5 N.J. Eq. 454
New York Court of Chancery
1846
Check Treatment
The Chancellor.

A father is entitled to the custody of his minor children, as guardian by nature, and guardian for nurture: 3 P. Wms. 154; 5 East. 221. Such guardianship is not assignable : 2 Swanst. 567, 571. The care and custody of minor children is a personal trust in the father; and be has no general power to dispose of them to another : 3 Hill's Rep. 410, 411.

The verbal agreement set up in this case is void as a contract for the apprenticeship of the child, by our act’ respecting apprentices and servants.

Prom these principles it follows that the respondent has no right to detain this child from the custody of its father.

In this case the child is of such tender years that the father could properly apply for the writ of habeas corpus in his own right, without the privity of the child ; and it is a case in which, for want of discretion in the child, it is proper that, instead of merely delivering the child from improper restraint, an order should be made, for .the delivery of the child to the father: 3 Hill, 399.

Order accordingly.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Mayne v. Baldwin
Court Name: New York Court of Chancery
Date Published: Jun 15, 1846
Citation: 5 N.J. Eq. 454
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.