History
  • No items yet
midpage
State ex rel. Manos v. Speese
83 Ohio St. 3d 1423
Ohio
1998
Check Treatment

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter. It appears from the records of this court that relators have not filed evidence and a brief, due August 27,1998, in compliance with S.CtPrac.R. X(9) and therefore have failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice, sua sponte. See State ex reí SuperAmeriea Group v. Licking Cty. Bd. of Elections (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 182, 685 N.E.2d 507.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Manos v. Speese
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Sep 9, 1998
Citation: 83 Ohio St. 3d 1423
Docket Number: 98-1684
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.