History
  • No items yet
midpage
State ex rel. Lytle v. Hottle
41 Ohio St. 3d 713
Ohio
1989
Check Treatment

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED by the court that said writ be, and the same is hereby, denied, effective February 7, 1989.

Moyer, C.J., Holmes, Douglas, Wright and Resnick, JJ., concur. Sweeney and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Lytle v. Hottle
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 8, 1989
Citation: 41 Ohio St. 3d 713
Docket Number: 89-182
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.