State ex rel. Leis v. OutcaltState ex rel. Leis v. Outcalt
The question presented by this cause is whether the issuance of the writ of mandamus by the Court of Appeals compelling respondent to sentence the defendant in conformity with R. C. 2929.11 was proper.
In State, ex rel. Cleveland, v. Calandra (1980),
“A prosecuting attorney, village solicitor, [or] city director of law* * *may appeal by leave of the court to which the appeal is taken any other decision, except the final verdict, of the trial court in a criminal case* * *.”
Although the instant cause differs from Calandra to some degree, inasmuch as the trial court in this cause refused to apply the sentence prescribed by statute,
Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Notes
State, ex rel. Moraites, v. Gorman (1975),