State ex rel. Koon v. Henderson, 258 So. 2d 383

State ex rel. Koon v. Henderson

258 So. 2d 383 | La. | 1972

Lead Opinion

In re: Joe Koon applying for remedial writs and habeas corpus.

Writ refused. On the factual findings of the trial judge, the showing made by applicant is insufficient to warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ must be granted and assigns reasons. TATE, J., is of the opinion that the defendant was entitled to counsel at the time of his guilty plea and that absent a showing this right was waived, his application has merit.

See Kitchens v. Smith, 401 U.S. 847, 91 S.Ct. 1089, 28 L.Ed.2d 519 (1971).

DIXON, J., is of the opinion that Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799, requires the granting of this writ.

Dissenting Opinion

BARHAM, Justice

(dissenting from refusal to grant writs).

The district court judge admits that defendant pleaded and was sentenced without counsel. The writs must be granted. See Kitchens v. Smith, 401 U.S. 847, 91 S.Ct. 1089, 28 L.Ed.2d 519 (1971), my dissent in Ardoin v. Henderson, 255 La. 1029, 233 So.2d 923 (1970), and my dissents in State ex rel. Walker v. Henderson, 259 La. 712, 252 So.2d 438 and State ex rel. DeVille v. Henderson, 259 La. 951, 253 So.2d 792, and the dissents cited there.