410 P.2d 945 | Mont. | 1966
On January 21, 1966, petitioners filed an application for writ of supervisory control and following an ex parte hearing
The basis for the application is the entry of a summary judgment in favor of one of the defendants in a civil negligence action under Eule 54(b), M.E.Civ.P., appealable under Eule 1, M.E.App.Civ.P. Petitioners contend the remedy by appeal is inadequate because of the advanced age of the ward of plaintiffs, the length of time the litigation has been pending without trial, the fact that trial could be had in the immediate future if petitioners were not required to follow the appeal procedures, and that no trial can be fairly and intelligently had without presence of the defendant dismissed from the action by virtue of the summary judgment.
The Montana Eules of Appellate Civil Procedure provide in Eule 9(a): “Composition of the Record on Appeal. The original papers and exhibits filed in the district court, the transcript of proceedings, if any, and a certified copy of the docket entries prepared by the clerk of the district court shall constitute the record on appeal in all cases.”
We are advised that no testimony was taken in the district court hearing, and the other requirements for the record are immediately available. An appeal could be taken forthwith and unless counsel desire additional time for briefing such appeal could be submitted upon the briefs filed in this original proceeding.
In view of the provisions of the Montana Eules of Appellate Civil Procedure for the expeditious handling of appeals we are not inclined to issue writs of supervisory control as a method of short cut appeal, except under the most extenuating circumstances which we need not attempt to catalog. In this cause no such circumstances appear.
The writ requested is denied and the proceeding is dismissed.
