564 P.2d 1099 | Or. Ct. App. | 1977
The juvenile appeals from an order remanding him to adult court for trial on a charge of first degree robbery. ORS 164.415. As the state confesses error in that it failed to prove the juvenile’s age, see ORS 419.476,
The juvenile contends further that there was insufficient evidence to establish that he would not be amenable to the rehabilitative programs available to the juvenile court and that retaining jurisdiction would not serve the child’s best interest. See ORS 419.533(1)(c).
Reversed and remanded.
ORS 419.476 provides:
1The juvenile court has exclusive original jurisdiction in any case involving a person who is under 18 years of age * *
ORS 419.533(l)(c) provides:
"A child may be remanded to a circuit * * * court of competent jurisdiction for disposition as an adult if * * * [t]he juvenile court determines that retaining jurisdiction will not serve the best interest of the child because the child is not amenable to rehabilitation in facilities or programs available to the court.”