History
  • No items yet
midpage
State ex rel. Joyner v. Roberts
114 N.C. 389
N.C.
1894
Check Treatment
Per OuriaM:

There was error on the part of the Judge in leaving the question of reasonable inquiry to the jury. Emry v. Railroad, 109 N. C., 589. As the case goes back for a new trial it is proper to say that if the circumstances testified to by the defendant and the witness Futrell are true, then, under our authorities, the defendant would have made such reasonable inquiry as is contemplated by the statute. New Trial.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Joyner v. Roberts
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Feb 15, 1894
Citation: 114 N.C. 389
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.