History
  • No items yet
midpage
State Ex Rel. Hubbard v. Piper
47 A. 703
| N.H. | 1900
|
Check Treatment

It is only when a building is used for the illegal purpose that it becomes a nuisance under the statute, and the court has jurisdiction only upon an information or petition in which the building complained of is sufficiently described. P. S, c. 205, s. 4; Laws 1899, c. 81, s. 1; State v. Saunders, 66 N.H. 39, 90; State v. Batcheller, 66 N.H. 145; State v. Currier, 66 N.H. 622. The building to which Piper and Gray moved after this proceeding was begun was not complained of or described in the petition, and the question whether they should be enjoined for maintaining nuisance therein is therefore not before the court.

Case discharged.

BLODGETT, C. J., did not sit: the others concurred. *Page 283

Case Details

Case Name: State Ex Rel. Hubbard v. Piper
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1900
Citation: 47 A. 703
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.