History
  • No items yet
midpage
State ex rel. Hillman v. Gordon
105 Wash. 326
Wash.
1919
Check Treatment
Mount, J.

In this case the defendants were cited to show cause why they should not be punished for contempt for an alleged violation of an order of this court restraining them from proceeding further in a case pending in the lower court. In addition to answering upon the merits, the defendants have moved to quash the citation because this court was without jurisdiction to enter the order. In the case of State ex rel. Hillman v. Superior Court, ante p. 324, 177 Pac. 773, we have held that this court was without jurisdiction to enter the order which, it is alleged, has been violated. Conceding, without deciding, that the defendants have, in substance, violated the order, this court has held that disobedience of an order issued by a court without jurisdiction of the subject-matter is not contempt. State ex rel. Evans v. Winder, 14 Wash. 114, 44 Pac. 125, and cases there cited. See, *327also, Simon Piano Co. v. Fairfield, 103 Wash. 206, 174 Pac. 457; 9 Cyc. 10.

The citation is therefore dismissed.

Main, O. J., Fullerton, Parker, and Holcomb, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Hillman v. Gordon
Court Name: Washington Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 10, 1919
Citation: 105 Wash. 326
Docket Number: No. 15084
Court Abbreviation: Wash.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.