History
  • No items yet
midpage
State Ex Rel. Hein v. Cull
135 Ohio St. 602
Ohio
1939
Check Treatment

Section 140 of the Charter of the city of Cleveland provides that "no person in the classified service of the city shall act as an officer of a political organization" or engage otherwise in political activities.

The question for determination is whether the relator, holding a temporary appointment under the conditions described, is a person in the classified service *Page 604 of the city of Cleveland within the operation of Section 140 of the Charter.

In line with the holding in the case of State, ex rel.Slovensky, v. Taylor, Dir., ante, 601, it is our opinion that he is, and is therefore subject to the restraints imposed on such persons as a condition of their employment.

Under the circumstances, the respondents properly refused to certify relator's name on the payroll.

The relator is not entitled to a writ of mandamus, and the same will be denied.

Writ denied.

WEYGANDT, C.J., DAY, ZIMMERMAN, WILLIAMS and MYERS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State Ex Rel. Hein v. Cull
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 5, 1939
Citation: 135 Ohio St. 602
Docket Number: 27445
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.