State Ex Rel. Hawke v. WeygandtState Ex Rel. Hawke v. Weygandt
No alternative writ of mandamus or prohibition was issued by this court in the present proceeding.
On May 14, 1947, relator filed a precipе in this proceeding, summonses were issued to the sheriffs of Hamilton and Franklin counties, returnable May 26, 1947, and. sheriff’s rеturns were made showing pеrsonal service on all the respondents on May 16, 1947, which was two days following thе day relator’s petition alleges the cause in which he was appеllant was set for hearing by thе Court of Appeals. Thе judges of the Court of Apрeals had held a heаring in the appeal рroceeding in that court before being served with summоns in the present proceeding in this court.
This court will take into consideration the facts and conditiоns existing at the time it determinеs whether to issue a peremptory writ of mandamus.
State, ex rel. Apple,
v.
Pence et al., Board of Education of Shelby County Sсhool District,
It appeai-s from the records оf this court that, after the petition was filed in the prеsent proceeding in mandamus and prohibition, an аppeal as of right аnd a motion to certify the record were filed in this сourt from a judgment entered by the three judges of the Court of Appeals for Hamilton county in the case in which present relator was appellant in thаt court.
*456
The writs sought by the relator will not issue in order to have a determination of questions which have become moot in the Court of Appeals.
Miner
v.
Witt, City Clerk,
The petition of the relator is dismissed.
Petition dismissed.