History
  • No items yet
midpage
State ex rel. Hamlin v. Collins
65 Ohio St. 2d 63
Ohio
1981
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The sole issue before this court is whether mandamus is a proper remedy for appellant to pursue the back pay allegedly due to him. There is no question, based on past decisions of this court, that mandamus is proper under these facts. See State, ex rel. Colangelo, v. McFaul (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 200; State, ex rel. Martin, v. Columbus (1979), 58 Ohio St. 2d 261; State, ex rel. Osborn, v. Jackson (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 41; State, ex rel. Dean, v. Huddle (1976), 45 Ohio St. 2d 234; Monaghan v. Richley (1972), 32 Ohio St. 2d 190.

Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause remanded to that court for further proceedings.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Celebrezze, C. J., W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Hamlin v. Collins
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 25, 1981
Citation: 65 Ohio St. 2d 63
Docket Number: No. 80-1235
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.