State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial Commission, 46 Ohio St. 2d 271

Per Curiam.

Appellant contends that “respondent grossly abused its discretion by awarding a percentage of disability in reliance upon medical reports of conditions (a) other than those for which the claim was allowed, (b) not supported by objective evidence of (c) new and changed conditions. ’ ’

However, a review of the record discloses that there is evidence which supports the findings of the Industrial Commission, and, accordingly, this court will not disturb that determination. See State, ex rel. General Motors Corp., v. Indus. Comm. (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 278, 282.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals denying the writ is affirmed. .

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neiml, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan,- Stern.,- Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court

Date Published: May 26, 1976

Citations: 46 Ohio St. 2d 271; 347 N.E.2d 526; 75 Ohio Op. 2d 322; 1976 Ohio LEXIS 630; No. 76-45

Docket Number: No. 76-45

Court Abbreviation: Ohio