History
  • No items yet
midpage
State ex rel. Fulton & Co. v. Colerick
3 Ohio 487
Ohio
1828
Check Treatment
By the Court:

We take the distinction to be, that where the sureties have notice of the suit, and may, or do make defense, the judgment against the principal is conclusive against them. Where such notice is not given, the judgment against the ^principal is prima facie only. It may be impeached for Collusion, or for mistake. But, until so impeached, it is sufficient to entitle the ¡plaintiff to recover the amount for which it is rendered. This court have so ruled in the case of Commissioners of Brown Co. v. Butt, in error, 2 Ohio, 347. And we see no reason to be dissatisfied with the opinion then given. In this case no evidence was offered by the defendants. The motion for a new assessment of damages is overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Fulton & Co. v. Colerick
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 15, 1828
Citation: 3 Ohio 487
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.